01/23/2010

Advertising is a Catalyst, Not an Answer

Thousands of years ago, we learned how to tell our story visually.  Commercial messages have been found in the ruins of Pompei and paintings on rock walls were quite popular for awhile.   As more people learned how to read and write, we evolved how we communicate.  Rock walls lost their fizz and town criers became cool until we created the printing press.  Eventually, someone had the bright idea of creating a daily update and we moved into the world of newspapers.  With all this new space available to reach people, it wasn’t too long before the first paid advertising occurred in 1836 in the French newspaper, La Presse. 

 

Once ads started, ad agencies were not far behind with the creation of Havas in the 1840’s as everyone realized how ads could help newspapers lower price and reach valuable customers.   Not much changed for the next 150 or so years as we learned how to get more sophisticated in how we advertise, but the concept was largely the same.   We went from rock walls to billboards.  From commercial messages in Pompei to commercial messages on TV.  The concept was the same and when done well, it was amazingly effective.   

 

Fast forward to 1998 and our friends at Google emerge with a new way to learn and tell your story.  Disruptive for sure, but we are often slow to change, so many folks, even today, still hold on to the idea that advertising is the way to tell your story and for customers to learn about your brand.  Just one more billboard…one more SuperBowl Ad….just one more of a lot of things. 

 

The reality is we are experiencing a shift in the importance of advertising.  It is still important, but in a much different way.   

 

Advertising is no longer the most effective way to tell your story.  Customers believe their peers are more credible.  Most of us form our first impression of a brand via search.  We read ratings and reviews.  We learn on YouTube. 

 

Advertising is now a catalyst that triggers an offline and online experience that leads customers to learn, share and decide what they will do in the future and they do this on their own time.   Anyone who spends a lot of money in advertising or email marketing or other forms of promotion is experiencing this change. 

 

Future leaders in Marketing will  use advertising strategically to start conversations or to shift the conversation, but will not have the expectation that the campaign will be the answer and the key driver of all sales success.  It will lead to more focused use of advertising and less continual drip versions of campaigns. 

 

The answer is all about what your customers, the people who buy your brands, do when their awareness is triggered.  And they do this for weeks and months after their interest is triggered, not when you want them to do it.  Here is a sample of what is happening today. 

 

Consumers exposed to display advertising are spending far more time (55%) than average visitors going to a site up to 30 days after the ad is seen (and page views were up 50+% in the same study)

48% of Twitter users introduced to a brand on Twitter say they are compelled to search for additional information.

30% of this same group say their inspiration is to learn more.

44% recommend products in social media and 39%  have discussed a product specifically on Twitter.

 

Essentially, advertising starts the search to learn more.  And I mean, search, literally.

 

Even the large holding companies are embracing this change.  Group M, part of WPP, did research showing that consumers exposed to a brand’s social media and paid search programs are 2.8x more likely to search for that brand’s products compared to users who only saw paid search. 

 

So next time you are thinking of investing money in an advertising campaign, ask yourself the following questions:

 

#1 – Is this an integrated campaign that will create the right learning experience for my customer?

#2 – Am I measuring the online impact of how people search, recommend and discuss my brand related to the advertising over time or am I still stuck measuring the old school stuff, like traffic to my site and other short-term transactional measures?

#3 – Am I launching a campaign that actually builds intelligence on how customers want to interact, so I can understand how to build a lasting communications model that works for the brand and the customer?

#4 –Is my campaign flexible enough that I can adjust to what I learn?

#5 – Am I investing in what really matters to move the needle? 

 

We are at the beginning of a major transition in how we utilize advertising effectively.  It will remain valuable, but how we use it will change significantly. 

 

All the best, Bob

01/17/2010

Are You Really Listening to Your Customers? 7 Important Areas……

Yep…uh huh…right….click, click, click….no, I’m listening…seriously, I’m listening….click, click, click…what? Can you say that again? 

 

Sound familiar?  It’s the cadence of corporate life these days……we are half-listening, which in my view, is not listening at all. 

 

Strategic listening is becoming a competitive advantage for companies.  And for those who truly listen, they are realizing that it is not as simple as it sounds.  When done well, it becomes incredibly powerful – it is the cornerstone of your online strategy. 


The reason is that strategic listening involves a number of variables.  It’s the nuances of listening that lead to the breakthroughs.  Conversations provide clues that three-ring binders never could compete with.  Leaders talk about where conversations occur, who has influence and which words are most powerful.  They are developing their own knowledge base that only gets stronger with time.  Followers are still talking in conference rooms looking at slides with pie charts and using group-think to debate what may be happening. 

 

It’s time to look at the “walk” as well as the “talk” in listening. 

 

Here are 7 important areas in strategic listening. 

 

#1 – Location, Location, Location – remember the old adage that the three most important factors in buying a home are location, location and location?  Same with conversations.  Know where your customers hang. 

 

#2 – Share of Conversation – throw away the slides showing positive, negative and neutral comments.  When data makes you guess what is happening, you don’t have data, you have just  “collected noise”.  Leaders know exactly who is driving share of conversation for their brand….with precision….they know what is happening behind the pie charts, graphs and tables…..they don’t guess.

 

#3 – Customer Expressions of Faith & Concern – they are equally important.  When a customer takes time to tell you what they think, either via a rating and review or a complaint or by answering a question, they are giving you a view into their way of thinking.  What do your most active customers actually care about and how is it trending?  Is your knowledge real-time or is it based on data that is months old?  Do you know exactly?

 

#4 – Ideas – customers like to do three things…share ideas, share product knowledge and provide each other with solutions to problemsCustomers can’t wait to provide you with their best intellectual capital.  All you have to do is grant permission by asking them in an idea site or on the phone when they call technical support.  Let your customers loose and watch what happens.  

 

#5 – The New Language – leaders know the exact words their customers use when they are talking online.  They don’t think in terms of keyword dictionary spreadsheets.  They think about the language of the customer.  Search is about customers using their language to find what they want.  Too often, our search strategies actually don’t reflect the prioritization of the customer’s words of choice.  Pretty amazing to me.   

 

#6 – What’s Bothering Me – many companies hope to avoid calls with complaints, but, in reality, you can learn so much.  Imperfect companies improve immensely by listening, learning and sharing what they are being told…..right away.  And we all know there are no perfect companies..yet.

 

#7 – How Customers Learn – now that you are listening to your customers, you develop an understanding about how they like to learn.  For example, maybe it really does make sense to start telling your story via video.  Or a certain group of customers would prefer to only receive information via their smart phone.  Do you know how they like to learn? Or how you want them to learn?

 

When you become a strategic listener, the world opens up along with opportunities for your brands.  What was that? Huh? Click, click, click…just a second….yep, be there in a minute…huh?  J

 

Push out the noise in your corporate life…..it never was helpful to begin with……make the customer your learning center every day.  Just make it happen....

 

Enjoy, Bob

 

01/09/2010

WeissWatch ThoughtLeader Interview: Michael Fleming, GSK USA

In this first edition of WeissWatch ThoughtLeaders - a new podcast series that features conversations with influential people in organizations around the world – guest Michael Fleming of GlaxoSmithKline USA and host Neville Hobson discuss communication and engagement in the pharma industry including the objectives behind and experiences with “More Than Medicine,” the GSK US public blog launched in May 2009; the role of social media; and commentary on the FDA social media hearing in November 2009 and implications for healthcare communications.

Listen Right Now

Download the Podcast (MP3, 8.1Mb, 17:38)

To automatically receive future episodes as they are published, subscribe to the RSS feed. You can also subscribe at iTunes (coming soon).

About Our Guest

michaelfleming-sm As head of new and social media communications for GSK US Pharmaceuticals, Michael Fleming is spearheading exploration and adoption of social media strategies across both product marketing and corporate communications.  He leads the team that recently launched the first US pharma blog, "More than Medicine" and the company's foray into Twitter. Previously, Michael led US product communications at GSK.

Before joining GSK, he held positions in global marketing, public affairs, and operations at Searle and DuPont Pharmaceuticals. Earlier in his career, Michael was a senior aide to a US Senator and he continues to be active in politics and civic affairs.

Your Feedback

Do you have a comment, question or suggestion about this episode of The WeissWatch Podcast? Feel free to let us know what’s on your mind - leave a comment in this post for inclusion in the next episode. If you wish, you can email your comment, question or suggestion as an MP3 file attachment (max 3 minutes / 5Mb file size) to weisswatchpodcast@wcgworld.com.

Podsafe music from Moving On Swiftly by The Smallvilles.

Enjoy the show!

01/07/2010

WCG Headlines PR Week's List of Agencies to Watch in 2010

A big thanks to the folks at PRWeek and all the staff at WCG for a stellar year that led to the Editor's Choice award for the top agencies to watch in 2010.  PR Week noted WCG's growth in headcount and revenue, as well as rapid expansion of creative and social media capabilities, as indicators that WCG will indeed be one of the top agencies to watch in 2010.  Other agencies that were recognized include MS&L, Waggener Edstrom, Next Fifteen, and Ogilvy PR Worldwide.

From PR Week:

"WeissComm, once a traditional healthcare PR shop, used 2009 to expand its offerings further into social media and creative services through a number of acquisitions and hires. It says it expects revenues for 2009 to increase 40% year-over-year.
 
The acquisitions set a tone for the San Francisco-based agency, especially during a year where many firms were cutting budgets and staff. Going into 2010, it is well positioned for more growth.
 
With its integrated offerings, the firm is more than poised to take the lead as a counselor and strategist on issues relating to the FDA's policy on online communications, healthcare reform, new technology, and the growing consumer health sector.
 
If the FDA develops guidance for social media and online communications, the firm, which has been a key partner in developing social media strategies for some of the largest pharma companies, can guide its clients through changes as a true adviser.
 
WeissComm's acquisitions will also help it develop client relationships outside the traditional pharma and biotech sphere. Yet, many firms are remaining cautious about 2010. If budgets don't increase and revenues stay flat, the agency could face challenges in maintaining its success."

http://www.prweekus.com/editors-choice-2010-who-to-watch/article/160360/2/

01/06/2010

The Top 10 Health Stories of 2009

When it comes to staying on top of the collective news cycle, accurately tracking and knowing the stories that prompt conversation is the key. Being connected to the audience and their interests is impossible without an understanding of what has mattered in the past.

Health reform on Capitol Hill, the H1N1 virus, breakthroughs in cancer and obesity research, and the merging of Pfizer and Wyeth into the world’s largest pharma company were all big news in 2009.

While several organizations have done a nice job of synthesizing the top issues driving healthcare news coverage this past year (Harvard Health Letter, Time Magazine), our Media and Technology group went a step further to examine the exact articles that had the greatest impact online.

Starting from a list of more than 500 news articles and blog posts, WCG developed a simple algorithm to zero in on the Top 10 stories from 2009.  The ranking, highlighted below, considers factors such as the number of websites that link to an article, how many people commented on it, how broadly it was disseminated in Twitter and top social bookmarking sites, and how many websites referenced the article’s headline.

We look forward to discussing with you more about how we arrived at the Top 10 and using similar analytics and approaches as we continue to innovate new ways of analyzing what drives influence online.  Please use the Comments section below to add your thoughts.

Top 10 Stories of 2009

 

Rank

 Index*

Headline

Author

Outlet

1

100

House Democrats pass health-care bill

Lori Montgomery and Shailagh Murray

Washington Post

2

59.36922

Why We Need Health Care Reform

Barrack Obama

NY Times

3

56.66738

Obama signs massive, 'imperfect' spending bill

Danny DeFreitas (Deputy Editor)

MSNBC

4

48.59569

Congress Slams Panel for New Mammogram Guidelines

John McKenzie and John Parkinson

ABC News

5

42.31632

HIV/AIDS: The incurable epidemic

Fred Hiatt (Editor)

Washington Post

6

34.41015

24 hours in the ER' shows challenges of health system

Susan Page, Marisol Bello, John Fritze, Mary Brophy Marcus and Liz Szabo

USA Today

7

34.22327

WHO raises pandemic alert to second-highest level

Vital Signs Blog--Contributors Dr. Sanjay Gupta and Barbara Starr

CNN

8

28.60779

Senate Blocks Use of New Mammogram Guidelines

David M. Herszehorn

NY Times Prescriptions Blog

9

27.43842

New guidelines: Pap smears can start at 21

Julia Sommerfeld (Editor)

MSNBC

10

18.03716

Obama Ends Stem Cell Research Ban

CBS News

Associated Press


*Index: the measure that defines the relative impact of each article when compared with all of the articles collected from 2009; This is the final output from the algorithm describes above.

This list brings to life the common concerns and interest of the broad healthcare audience. This ranges from the average person who simply keeps up with the news to the top health industry executive who never stops monitoring the issues. Now, what will the focus be in 2010? It’s impossible to know, but I leave you with the proof that news flow matters and the stories the audience chooses are what drives it.

12/21/2009

The WeissWatch Podcast #5: December 21, 2009

Welcome to the The WeissWatch Podcast: talking points for clients, colleagues and friends of the WeissComm Group. To automatically receive episodes as they are published, subscribe to the RSS feed. You can also subscribe at iTunes (coming soon).

In This Episode:

  • Bob Pearson, Chief Technology and Media Officer, and Neville Hobson, Head of Social Media Europe, discuss ten trends that will matter to every company in 2010 including search, mobile, video, trust and influence; Bob offers some insight into the behaviours and communication leadership that the best companies will demonstrate in the coming year.

Listen Right Now

Download the Podcast (MP3, 5.5Mb, 12:07)

Do you have a comment, question or suggestion about this episode of The WeissWatch Podcast? Feel free to let us know what’s on your mind - leave a comment in this post for inclusion in the next episode. If you wish, you can email your comment, question or suggestion as an MP3 file attachment (max 3 minutes / 5Mb file size) to weisswatch@googlemail.com.

Podsafe music from Moving On Swiftly by The Smallvilles.

Enjoy the show!

12/12/2009

Google Debuts New Twitter Search Results

On December 11th, Google debuted their new real time search results for Tweets. This is the latest in a movement among social media and search companies that underscores a preference for real time content.

When searching for certain keywords you will now find call outs for the most recent Tweets pertaining to your search.


Google Real Time Twitter Results

11/22/2009

Why Measuring Click-Throughs is Next to Meaningless

Whenever we do something long enough, we start to assume it actually is meaningful.  Of course, this is often where we get into trouble.

 

A great example is our fascination with click-through rates.  If we run an ad and people click through to a site, we are endlessly fascinated by whether our click-through rate was higher than last time or higher than average.

 

The real conclusion?  It’s not relevant.  It’s at best a basic diagnostic measure. 

 

Here’s why. 

 

People often take action over a period of a month or so after they learn about something via display advertising.  We are not as pavlovian as once thought.  And when we do get around to visiting, we tend to spend 55% more time than average visitors to the site.  So ask yourself if you are measuring what is convenient (a click through) or what is real (activity over a period of one month). 

 

Now, think of social media sites.  One study showed that 48% of Twitter users who were introduced to a brand on Twitter were compelled to search for additional information.  44% of people said they recommend products in social media and 39% said they have discussed a product specifically on Twitter.  Facebook users edged out Twitter with 46% talking about or recommending products.

 

This is interesting.  What it tells us is that if advertising is truly compelling, customers will take their own action to recommend and discuss your brand.  The flip side is that if there is silence, it is more clear than ever that you did not make a real impact.   Are you measuring the conversations you generate or not?  Good question to ask yourself.

 

Now, how about a nod towards integration.  Research by GroupM basically says that if you do a campaign in isolation, it doesn’t achieve nearly as much as if you combine social media and paid search.  In fact, you are 2.8x more likely to have someone search for that brand’s products compared to users who only saw paid search.  So, when you measure one variable such as paid search, is this actually correct or should you be looking at the total impact you make over a period of time based on what you do via natural and paid search? 

 

I believe I know the answer.  Evolve how you measure.  In today’s world, we can see quite transparently if customers care or not by what they say.  Don’t guess, make sure your measurement tells you definitively what reality is for you.

 

All the best, Bob

11/18/2009

Common Sense POV: Facebook's New Promotions Guidelines

Facebook recently released new Promotions Guidelines, which will likely have huge implications for brands and companies engaging with their customers on the platform.  This newest policy update applies only to contests and sweepstakes -- however, it is yet to be seen whether or not Facebook will extend such guidelines to other promotions such as coupons.

Perhaps coincidence, but it’s interesting to note that these new guidelines come only weeks after the FTC’s Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials - which  we’ve discussed here and here, and on the heels of the FDA’s public hearing on promotion via the internet and social media, summarized here by Bob Pearson.  

Although Facebook’s new guidelines do not prohibit companies or brands from running promotions, this is a significant change in that Facebook is moving towards monetizing yet another stream within the platform (e.g., advertise or bust).  In a way, it’s not unlike moves that YouTube made, only they did it earlier and it was predicated by the technological requirements of running a video (only) platform.

The complete Facebook guidelines can be found here.  To save you the click, I’ve included a few key highlights below.  You can also check out Michael Richter’s (Deputy General Counsel for IP at Facebook) blog post, in which he explains their thinking about the changes:

Section 1 General

1.3 You will not in any way use our name, trademarks, trade names, copyrights, or any other of our intellectual property in the rules or any other materials relating to the promotion, without express written consent.

While this isn’t new to Facebook, I’ve noted it here as I believe it will tie into point 3.6 below, so worth keeping in mind for planning purposes.

Section 3 Administering a Promotion through the Facebook Platform

You may not administer any promotion through Facebook, except that you may administer a promotion through the Facebook Platform with our prior written approval. Such written approval may be obtained only through an account representative at Facebook. If you are already working with an account representative, please contact that representative to begin the approval process. If you do not work with an account representative, you can use this contact form to inquire about working with an account representative. If we provide you such approval, you agree to the following:

3.1 You will only administer the promotion through an application on the Facebook Platform, as directed by us.

3.2 You will only allow users to enter the promotion in the following locations on Facebook:

3.2.1 On the canvas Page of an application on the Facebook Platform.

3.2.2 On an application box in a tab on a Facebook Page.

3.3 You will include the following language in a clear and conspicuous manner adjacent to any promotion entry field: "This promotion is in no way sponsored, endorsed or administered by, or associated with, Facebook. You understand that you are providing your information to [recipient(s) of information] and not to Facebook. The information you provide will only be used for [disclose any way that you plan to use the user's information]."

3.4 You will not mention “Facebook” in the promotion's rules except in the following ways: (i) "You can enter the Promotion through the [application name] application on the Facebook Platform. You can also find the application on the [tab name] tab on the [Page name] Page on Facebook."; (ii) to fulfill your obligations under Section 3.7.

3.5 You will designate an individual to act as a primary contact to address any communications from us with respect to the promotion.

3.6 You must submit materials for any promotion you plan on administering through the Facebook Platform to your account representative for our review and approval at least 7 days prior to the start date of such promotion. Promotions not approved in writing within such time period will be deemed unapproved.

3.7 You will include the following provisions within your official rules for the promotion:

3.7.1 Acknowledgement that the promotion is in no way sponsored, endorsed or administered by, or associated with, Facebook.

3.7.2 Complete release for us from each entrant or participant.

3.7.3 Any questions, comments or complaints regarding the promotion will be directed to you, not us.

The most important section of these guidelines – outlining specific requirements on where you can run a promotion, what specific disclaimers you must attach, and the fact that you must get approval of promotional materials at least 7 days in advance – through your Facebook account representative (e.g., you’ll need to establish an account representative (code for: you need to advertise!)

Section 4 Publicizing a Promotion on Facebook

4.2 In the rules of the promotion, or otherwise, you will not condition entry to the promotion upon taking any action on Facebook, for example, updating a status, posting on a profile or Page, or uploading a photo.

This mandate seems to directly target the more recent, growing trend with contests and promotions to require a Facebook status update.  Hat tip to Facebook’s attorneys for foreseeing future litigation and putting this on paper now.

While these guidelines provide some additional hurdles, the good news is that they don’t shut the door on promotions done right.  The bad news is that added steps and (no doubt) advertising costs will prohibit many companies from running repeated, small prize contests, which are often more effective than one time contests with big payouts.   What do you think?  Is Facebook making itself a more or less attractive channel for contests and promotions?

11/16/2009

Perspective on the FDA Social Media Hearing

 The FDA has completed a two-day Part 15 Public Hearing titled “Promotion of FDA-Regulated Medical Products Using the Internet and Social Media Tools”.  A total of 76 presentations were heard by a packed room and large webcast audience.  This phase of the public hearing will continue until February 28, 2010, which is the last day to submit public testimony.  The current thinking is that guidelines could emerge as early as Summer, 2010, although no formal commitment to a timeline has been given.

The tenor of the presentations was quite clear.  It is time to figure out how manufacturers can engage directly with customers online.  This was a nearly unanimous theme.  On the flip side, very few solutions were offered at this time.   And as Tom Abrams, Director of DDMAC said, “conversations are enduring and seen by millons”, so we need to figure out how to engage in the right way.  

So, out of 76 presentations, here’s a “cut through the clutter”.  Part I addresses key questions discussed of importance to future guidelines.  Part II reflects how the world has changed and why guidelines will need to account for these market changing developments.

Part I

#1 – If you correct information online, are you responsible for the full conversation?  -- Speakers made the point that companies cannot be held responsible for every comment made on every site worldwide.   However, it is important for companies to be empowered to correct information on third-party sites in a conversational style and continue to monitor those sites to see if a 2nd or 3rd comment is warranted to provide further clarification.  In other words, the future will be about how to monitor and engage selectively and effectively to ensure the right benefit and safety info is available online.

#2 – What is the Most Effective Way to Share Safety Information? – I don’t believe anyone is defending the current approach of mentioning side effects at the end of a TV commercial or clicking to highly detailed, hard to read information.  Rather, in today’s world, we have an opportunity to display safety info online that is easier to read and navigate before the first click.  The good news is that the web makes it much easier for us to create the right experience. 

#3 – Current paid search ads suffer from lack of clarity and lack of conversion – data shows that when you understand upfront what is being advertised, click conversion is higher.  Many of today’s ads require you to click to find out more, since the upfront ad is not clear enough.  Conversion goes down.  FDA was encouraged to work with companies to make it possible to have more transparency upfront. 

#4 -- How much identifiable criteria must be there to report an AE? – several people pointed out that the current MedWatch form for AE reporting to FDA is onerous.  Others discussed how few AE’s exist online vs. the total online conversation.   The conclusion is that current AE reporting mechanisms need to modernize and be simplified.  We also need the guidelines to clarify what a company’s obligations are as they further engage in conversation online.

#5 – Why extending a brand’s reach is linked to extending monitoring – if companies want to reach a wider audience online, then it’s important to conduct monitoring of a wider audience online, as well.  The two go together.   Responsibility for monitoring widens as your reach widens.

#6 -- Companies are responsible for communications they create or cause to be created – if a company has a hand in the creation of content, it’s responsible.  The presentations centered more around defining this from a financial standpoint. 

Part II

How the World Has Changed

As the FDA considers new guidelines, here are examples of how the marketplace has changed. 

#1 – Communities self-regulate effectively – online communities look out for the best interests of the community and self-regulate.   They are often the best at correcting information.  One example at the Hearing was VU-MEDI, a community for 10,000 surgeons, which provides a continual review more comprehensive and quicker than a typical peer-review process on new surgical procedures.

#2 – We don’t live in a simple one-click world – people search for the information they need/want and links are a critical part of the learning process.  It is normal to click horizontally for broader info or click vertically for deeper info on a given topic.  We don’t control a person’s search.  But, we can provide them with the most options on how and where to learn via clicks. .

#3 – Search now forms the first impression for a brand – where are your customers going for information about your brand, whether it involves benefits or safety info?

#4 – Offline/Online synergy is increasing – ComScore showed that 52% of people who see an offline campaign search online for more information.  This integration is becoming standard for our customers.  

#5 – The importance of peers -- Customers increasingly look to peers for advice.  They don’t need companies in the conversation to make a decision, but they would like companies to participate, which was clear in the surveys shown this week.  Companies and brands that are part of the full conversation will build trust and will be considered relevant to decision-making.  The same comment applies to the FDA.

#6 – Old-style websites are decreasingly relevant -- it is content syndication that matters, not traffic to a site.  The FDA will need to adjust what they require of websites to meet the new reality of how people utilize content, so content can be more easily shared.  

#7 – The importance of the “core community” – Customers will often spend their days in their core community.  Think of Facebook.  All the more reason why we need the ability to reach people in their communities, rather than asking them to visit our sites, which they may never do.

 

#8 – We can improve the reach of safety information – we can extend a brand’s safety information online simply by participating in forums, Yahoo! Answers and other parts of the web where we share approved FAQ’s and other related safety information.   When you combine with a strong SEO plan and knowledge of the right keywords, a brand’s reach can be extended widely with time.

#9 – The future is not with closed communities -- closed communities complicate the ability to publicly share information.  They prevent the syndication of important and relevant content.  Place more time on open communities when possible. 

#10 – Physician and patient influence is changing – we are seeing more physicians proactively utilize the web to find patients and share information.  At the same time, patients with the most influence may not be affiliated with a patient group.  They will be affiliated with great content and a loyal online audience.  Our customers are becoming more saavy online every day.

Overall, social media guidelines will require industry to provide innovative solutions to the FDA and for the FDA to create guidelines that can evolve with the medium, rather than place increasing constrictions on it.

All the best, Bob